X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634DED1E944 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:46:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50479-04 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:46:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4BD1E93C for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:46:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BOCmw-00004C-0V; Thu, 13 May 2004 10:46:02 +0100 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Design Rough Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:45:59 +0100 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FD3F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Design Rough thread-index: AcQ4zeKg56U1IO5bTUyDYYpzbnATrgAAHjuA From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" Cc: "Michael Glaesemann" , "Gavin M. Roy" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200405/61 X-Sequence-Number: 4440 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 13 May 2004 10:35 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Michael Glaesemann; Gavin M. Roy; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Design Rough >=20 >=20 > I don't strain my eyes only when reading the site in MSIE.=20 > Everything else --- Mozilla, Konqueror --- makes the letters=20 > *way* too small. >=20 > Of course, MSIE is the winner of the browser wars, so we may=20 > just stick to it. I quite agree, but after lots of experimentation, the people who had difficulties for whatever reason were happy. If it can be done another way that works universally then I have no problem with that, as long as we don't disadvantage anyone (which is illegal in the UK now incidently). Regards, Dave