X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8718D1B1A4; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:47:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22378-05; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:46:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADB5D1B196; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:46:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BOHTx-000MfP-0U; Thu, 13 May 2004 15:46:45 +0100 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:46:45 +0100 Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FD64@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites thread-index: AcQ4+FFeQhkQKlrdS9GhODxVeMpXuQAAGGRQ From: "Dave Page" To: "Robert Treat" , "David Fetter" Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW" , "Marc G. Fournier" , "Tom Lane" , "Josh Berkus" , "Rod Taylor" , "elein" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200405/66 X-Sequence-Number: 4445 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]=20 > Sent: 13 May 2004 15:39 > To: David Fetter > Cc: PostgreSQL WWW; Marc G. Fournier; Tom Lane; Josh Berkus;=20 > Rod Taylor; elein > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL=20 > Users' Group sites >=20 > hey look, a dead horse, let's go beat it... Sounds like fun... >=20 > they at least have the intention of meeting in person, which=20 > I think is what Mark was getting at.=20 Well just to chuck in my tuppence worth - I agree; regional sites are not user groups. 'User group' implies some sort of organised group of users. A website is no more a user group than Robert's dead horse. Of course, the group might have their own site (as might the horse), but that not what makes them a PUG. Regards, Dave.