public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
GIT repo broken 6+ messages / 4 participants [nested] [flat]
* GIT repo broken @ 2008-06-25 19:37 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2008-06-25 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]> Hi, I noticed the other day that the branches in the GIT postgresql.git repository do not contain any patch after it was released. For example, in http://git.postgresql.org/?p=postgresql.git;a=shortlog;h=REL8_3_STABLE the last commit is on 2008-02-12. For example this commit is not there: http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/nls-global.mk?rev=1.14 What's going on here? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GIT repo broken @ 2008-06-30 14:03 Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2008-06-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > I noticed the other day that the branches in the GIT postgresql.git > repository do not contain any patch after it was released. The cvs->git import script doesn't handle branches yet: this is a known problem, just wanted to reply here so there it is on record. No idea of when it might be fixed: I looked it over, but I need stronger git/ruby skills and/or more free time to figure it all out. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200806301002 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkho52AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg+SgCgnBctkzpmD2RQV+hhaUUe6I3R 6XcAn3IZvH1hW2mSChCuGKQ/X51OWDbt =gsaQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GIT repo broken @ 2008-06-30 14:11 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> parent: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2008-06-30 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > I noticed the other day that the branches in the GIT postgresql.git > > repository do not contain any patch after it was released. > > The cvs->git import script doesn't handle branches yet: this is a known problem, > just wanted to reply here so there it is on record. No idea of when it might > be fixed: I looked it over, but I need stronger git/ruby skills and/or more > free time to figure it all out. Huh, this seems to make the repo a non-starter for any serious work. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GIT repo broken @ 2008-06-30 15:57 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2008-06-30 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> On Monday 30 June 2008 10:03:15 Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > I noticed the other day that the branches in the GIT postgresql.git > > repository do not contain any patch after it was released. > > The cvs->git import script doesn't handle branches yet: this is a known > problem, just wanted to reply here so there it is on record. No idea of > when it might be fixed: I looked it over, but I need stronger git/ruby > skills and/or more free time to figure it all out. > I'm not entirely sure that is true though it certainly looks that way from initial start. I've been messing around with the ppa repo on some other git providers and I have repos that seem to have all of my branches... need to do a bit more legwork to determine if it is all actually working though. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GIT repo broken @ 2008-07-01 05:08 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2008-07-01 05:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> On Monday 30 June 2008 11:57:58 Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2008 10:03:15 Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > > I noticed the other day that the branches in the GIT postgresql.git > > > repository do not contain any patch after it was released. > > > > The cvs->git import script doesn't handle branches yet: this is a known > > problem, just wanted to reply here so there it is on record. No idea of > > when it might be fixed: I looked it over, but I need stronger git/ruby > > skills and/or more free time to figure it all out. > > I'm not entirely sure that is true though it certainly looks that way from > initial start. I've been messing around with the ppa repo on some other > git providers and I have repos that seem to have all of my branches... need > to do a bit more legwork to determine if it is all actually working though. > Just to follow up, I have managed to get all of the branches / tags from the PPA tree into a git repo. Now, this used my local git tools and tools of a git hosting service, so it is possible it wont work with the postgresql.org tools, but I think all the versions are the same, so hopefully it should. Still no sudo for me, so poke me on irc and we can do some testing. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GIT repo broken @ 2008-07-02 12:18 Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> parent: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2008-07-02 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 schrieb Greg Sabino Mullane: > The cvs->git import script doesn't handle branches yet: this is a known > problem, just wanted to reply here so there it is on record. No idea of > when it might be fixed: I looked it over, but I need stronger git/ruby > skills and/or more free time to figure it all out. I think the tool does handle branches, it just broke somewhere along the way and now it doesn't continue. It has been suspected that this happens when the git-cvs update happens while an rsync of the CVS repository is in progress, owing to the nonatomic nature of CVS. We should probably rebuild the Git repository sometime, but everytime you do that all the commit IDs change, and I haven't had the enthusiasm yet to give users a proper recipe for dealing with that, e.g., pulling and merging or rebasing to adjust existing clones to the upstream. If someone has an idea how to deal with the latter, I'd appreciate that. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-02 12:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-06-25 19:37 GIT repo broken Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 2008-06-30 14:03 ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> 2008-06-30 14:11 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 2008-06-30 15:57 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2008-07-01 05:08 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2008-07-02 12:18 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox