Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CED49F98E0 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38825-08 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98DF9F9DD2 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C1BB46CE1 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38310-09; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1903DB46CD7; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8824E0B7; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:05 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:14:36 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? Message-ID: <1024158988C3830886D632A8@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200711010402.lA142K628651@momjian.us> References: <200711010402.lA142K628651@momjian.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/4 X-Sequence-Number: 12782 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 00:02:20 -0400 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I've seen enormously erratic performance from the mailing lists all day >> today --- delivery time for individual messages is up to several hours, >> but completely inconsistent. Is it just me, or are other people seeing >> the same? > > I see the same. My posting to core took +2 hours to arrive and there > are only a few subscribers. 'k, what is useful is that *when* you see this, you send me the full headers so that I can look at, and hopefully figur eout, where the delay is ... if its something on our side, knowing when you see the problem, vs hours later really helps ... I can't fidn something I don't know is broke, and 2+ hours to deliver to -core is definitely something being broke ... Now that I know, I also think I know what the problem was, and have fixed it ... was doing some cleaning up of the virus/spam checker, and took out one too many IPs from DNS, so it was running at half-capacity ... there might still be some backlog to go through, so give it a few hours, but if you are still seeing issues tomorrow, send me full headers of one that is having the problem and I'll look into it further ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHKVKs4QvfyHIvDvMRAi+wAJ9z4fWsMDL2UXy0fedNPTQPwC33PwCdHU2w lo0nkBR+P9Lau2JImbtmc/s= =1fZG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----