X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0DCD1B4E1; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:24:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96619-03; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB83D1B523; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8PBGSqd015228; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:16:29 -0400 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [192.168.3.55]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8PCNBZ24275; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:23:11 -0400 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id TD8AT7RJ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:23:10 -0400 Subject: Re: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows From: Robert Treat To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Oleg Bartunov , Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200309241711.h8OHBMi20283@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200309241711.h8OHBMi20283@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 25 Sep 2003 08:23:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1064492591.25702.2084.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/102 X-Sequence-Number: 2570 On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > Don't be too hasty. I don't know about anyone else, but I'd welcome an > > > updated commercial native windows solution (When's SRA's port coming out > > > in 1.0?) , especially if they'd be willing to provide a "diff" of the > > > code back to the community. We might as well have someone get paid for > > > work we will probably have to do anyways... > > > > I think a few things that Oleg needs to find out first is whether or not > > PeerDirect *will* feed it back to the community ... how much did they feed > > back of Jan's work? Considering where win32 seems to be sitting, it > > doesn't seem like much ... > > PeerDirect contributed the code, but neither they or Jan wanted to port > it up to current CVS, and that's were we/I got stuck. > So it would be a boon for them to pay someone to bring it up to date (assuming they would donate it back to the community). > SRA's Windows port is up to 7.3.4, and I think they just released > version 1.1, so that is going fine --- and I have the source code to > use in our native Win32 port, just not the threading stuff. And if I've paid attention, the threading bits are what SRA used to get around the fork/exec issues? Incidentally I don't recall any announcements from SRA that they were past the beta development phase with their version, seems like that could have gotten some mention on the main postgresql site. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL