Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Changes to Contributor List
From: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Reply-To: pg@fastcrypt.com
To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <24293.1068166032@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311062316480.29650-100000@peter.localdomain>
	<200311061433.25857.josh@agliodbs.com> <24293.1068166032@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Cramer Consulting
Message-Id: <1068207517.13025.463.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 07 Nov 2003 07:18:37 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well the current argument aside, I do find it discouraging that there is
a considerable difference between the four sites, advocacy, gborg, dev,
and the main site, not only in form but in substance. 

I am listed on the dev site as a major contributor, but not on the
advocacy site. Where was the list compiled from on the advocacy site?


Dave 

On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > Peter,
> >> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
> 
> > This isn't helping.  What Robert was pointing out is that we don't
> > currently have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving
> > the site anytime soon.
> 
> Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
> Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> 
>