X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C7F3AD1C9CF; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:24:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 93392-01; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:24:51 -0400 (AST)
Received: from tht.net (vista.tht.net [216.126.88.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 71689D1CCD6; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:24:49 -0400 (AST)
Received: from [134.22.69.142] (dyn-69-142.tor.dsl.tht.net [134.22.69.142])
	by tht.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EFD1176BE7; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:23:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
From: Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
To: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <20040312165255.GY39391@xs4all.nl>
References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5DD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<200403111808.09687.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<200403111519.55064.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200403120811.24506.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<9272.1079104465@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<14858.199.222.14.2.1079109814.squirrel@www.idigx.com>
	<20040312165255.GY39391@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1079112222.736.5.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:23:43 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/176
X-Sequence-Number: 3992

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:52, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:43:34AM -0600, Thomas Swan wrote:
> > 
> > foundry.postgresql.org?
> 
> Been through that one...  Too long when you have to add project name as
> well.

I don't understand why. Presumably the postgresql.org website will have
a search for it, or it'll be a link, or it'll be a bookmark.

How many people actually type in the full url anymore?

Heck, when I goto the postgresql website I do a search in google for
"postgres" and slam the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

Having all PostgreSQL related material under one domain is beneficial to
the project. Our big issue isn't the domain is too long, it is difficult
find the subproject in the first place.