X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D69D1B903; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:34:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10167-06; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:34:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from tht.net (vista.tht.net [216.126.88.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5BED1C915; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:34:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from [134.22.69.142] (dyn-69-142.tor.dsl.tht.net [134.22.69.142]) by tht.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F4176A65; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:34:24 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. From: Rod Taylor To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" , Thomas Swan , Tom Lane , Robert Treat , PostgreSQL Development , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20040312142952.V64550@ganymede.hub.org> References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5DD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <200403111808.09687.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <200403111519.55064.josh@agliodbs.com> <200403120811.24506.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <9272.1079104465@sss.pgh.pa.us> <14858.199.222.14.2.1079109814.squirrel@www.idigx.com> <20040312165255.GY39391@xs4all.nl> <1079112222.736.5.camel@jester> <20040312142952.V64550@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1079116502.736.11.camel@jester> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:35:02 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/185 X-Sequence-Number: 4001 On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:30, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > Having all PostgreSQL related material under one domain is beneficial to > > the project. Our big issue isn't the domain is too long, it is difficult > > find the subproject in the first place. > > the projects site will not be under postgresql.org ... postgresql.net is > available for it, but not postgresql.org ... we are keeping that domain > "clean" for any future stuff we want to do with the core project ... I hope there is heavy integration between the two, otherwise anyone who doesn't read this forum will be very confused.