public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Rod Taylor <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeroen T. Vermeulen <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Swan <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Date: 12 Mar 2004 14:52:04 -0500
Message-ID: <1079121124.27322.13.camel@camel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<1079112222.736.5.camel@jester>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> writes:
> > the projects site will not be under postgresql.org ... postgresql.net is
> > available for it, but not postgresql.org ... we are keeping that domain
> > "clean" for any future stuff we want to do with the core project ...
>
> I agree we don't want <project>.postgresql.org, as that is likely to
> risk name conflicts. However, that objection doesn't apply to
> <project>.projects.postgresql.org, or variants of that. So far the only
> objection I've heard to that sort of setup is "the domain name is too
> long", and as others have pointed out, it's a weak objection.
>
> Since we do already own pgfoundry.org, could we satisfy everybody by
> dual-naming the project sites? That is, have both
> <project>.pgfoundry.org
> <project>.pgfoundry.postgresql.org
> point to the same place?
>
I hate to be the fly in this ointment, but wouldn't
<project>.projects.postgresql.org be better? especially if you could
then point people to projects.postgresql.org as the main place to start
looking for projects related to postgresql.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
view thread (38+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
In-Reply-To: <1079121124.27322.13.camel@camel>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox