public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <[email protected]>
Cc: Shachar Shemesh <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
Date: 23 Apr 2004 11:45:28 -0400
Message-ID: <1082735128.22969.1106.camel@camel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 05:22, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> 
> > When I ask about non-standard complience of Pg (turning unquoted 
> > identifiers to lowercase instead of uppercase, violating the SQL 
> > standard, and requring an expensive rewrite of clients), and I get the 
> > answer "uppercase is ugly", I think something is wrong.
> 
> I would love if someone fixed pg so that one can get the standard 
> behaviour. It would however have to be a setting that can be changed so we 
> are still backward compatible.
> 
> > that even if I write a patch to start migration, I'm not likely to get
> > it in.
> 
> Just changing to uppercase would break old code so such a patch should not
> just be commited. But would people stop a patch that is backward
> compatible (in the worst case a setting during initdb)? I'm not so sure
> they will.
> 

I know this to be true, but don't fully understand it... if our default
behavior is to fold lower, and we change it to just fold upper... then
in theory this shouldn't break anything since what used to be folder
lower will now simply be folder upper. the only people who will have a
problem are those who quote on one end but not the other, which is bad
practice anyways...  so i would say if your serious about it, make the
patch as GUC "case_folding" for upper or lower and get a taste for what
breaks inside the db. 

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL




view thread (145+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
  In-Reply-To: <1082735128.22969.1106.camel@camel>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox