X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EAFC7D1B198; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:39:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 16805-10; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:38:52 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (unknown [65.217.53.66])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 349E9D1B172; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:38:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100])
	by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4DCxQ9U006797;
	Thu, 13 May 2004 08:59:26 -0400
Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [192.168.3.55])
	by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4DEcbN32255;
	Thu, 13 May 2004 10:38:37 -0400
Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP
	(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72)
	id KL7TS2Y0; Thu, 13 May 2004 10:38:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>, elein <elein@varlena.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040512211541.GP1866@fetter.org>
References: <200405120946.01804.josh@postgresql.org>
	<1084395267.62466.39.camel@jester>
	<20040512154735.A35531@ganymede.hub.org>
	<200405121334.54328.josh@agliodbs.com> <28538.1084395043@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20040512180133.W35531@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040512211541.GP1866@fetter.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 13 May 2004 10:38:36 -0400
Message-Id: <1084459116.21180.2603.camel@camel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200405/65
X-Sequence-Number: 4444

hey look, a dead horse, let's go beat it...

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 17:15, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 06:03:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > > > I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that
> > > > they overlap.
> > >
> > > I agree with Josh.  We can sort it out if and when there's
> > > actually a conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty
> > > pointless.
> > 
> > I have to agree with Robert on this though ... a UG, at least what I
> > think is the defacto standard for it, is a group that gets together
> > ... linking to "PostgreSQL related web sites" is not for
> > pug.postgresql.org, or, at least, shouldn't be
> 
> Why not?
> 
> > ... a 'Related Sites' link off of www.postgresql.org, yes ...
> > 
> > I'm not so much worried about micro-managing, but there should be
> > *some* criteria for inclusion,
> 
> Great!  How about willingness to be included?  At this stage, that's
> plenty.
> 
> > and I think monthly, schedualed meetings should be a big one ...
> 
> Please pardon me while I add in a little reality check to this grand
> plan.  SF PostgreSQL Users' Group, far and away the largest to date,
> has had one once every 2-3 months.  According to this "criterion,"
> there are no pugs at all right now, let alone three fledgling ones.
> 

they at least have the intention of meeting in person, which I think is
what Mark was getting at. 

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL