public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:23:12 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<20071101080959.49f3087b@scratch>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<20071101092806.3b1fa452@scratch>
<[email protected]>
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> writes:
> But, again, it would be interesting to look at a specific one, with message-id,
> and see what the logs show for reasons of delays ...
Well, the current problems seem to be entirely inside hub.org, and so
all this banter about DNS etc seems not relevant. A handy example is
this same message I'm replying to, which seems to have been hung up
for 2.5 hours:
Received: from maia-2.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187] (may be forged))
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lA1JCPC2010552
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by maia-2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912252C9544
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4B49FC802
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 62395-04-7 for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:11 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E039FC8E6
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:22:40 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A428DB475C8
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:35 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220])
by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 56221-03; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:01 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67])
by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0BCB47581;
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2])
by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C34E165;
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:02 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:42:31 -0300
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]>
cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>,
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <20071101092806.3b1fa452@scratch>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <20071101080959.49f3087b@scratch>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <20071101092806.3b1fa452@scratch>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-www
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www;
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-www.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=sub%20pgsql-www>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-www>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [email protected]
regards, tom lane
view thread (59+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox