X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170F45E46C0 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:30:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61238-10 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:30:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (unknown [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BFA5E46BF for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:30:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7CGCh9U007796; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:12:43 -0400 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [10.225.10.110]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7CHUGN25421; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:30:16 -0400 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id PMWA8X7P; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:30:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Wrong version number on bug form (again) (still) From: Robert Treat To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <18940.1092259691@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <15581.1092250509@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1092258483.8615.2570.camel@camel> <18940.1092259691@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Aug 2004 13:30:15 -0400 Message-Id: <1092331815.398.191.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/101 X-Sequence-Number: 4876 On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 17:28, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat writes: > > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 14:55, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Actually I wonder that we shouldn't get rid of the popup and > >> just make the version a text entry field. > > > I am guessing the concern is that this forces people to pick something > > rather than not reporting a version at all. (Note, this isn't an > > objection to the idea, I'm rather ambivalent myself) > > That was probably the idea, but there is no guarantee that they'll pick > the right thing anyway. And if the box doesn't *offer* the right thing > then it's actively hurting the cause. I think on balance it's a loss. > Anyone else want to weigh in before I change it to an empty text box? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL