X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DEA9DCAB0 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:28:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39041-06 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:28:30 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9819DD65C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:28:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB1FSYoK010932; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:28:34 -0500 (EST) To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Marc Fournier , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor In-reply-to: <20051201133629.GA31881@surnet.cl> References: <20051118195430.GA26861@surnet.cl> <13652.1132361944@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20051119225514.GA16420@surnet.cl> <20051121133308.GB11527@surnet.cl> <20051121151652.GA12273@surnet.cl> <20051201133629.GA31881@surnet.cl> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:36:29 -0300" Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:28:34 -0500 Message-ID: <10931.1133450914@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/7 X-Sequence-Number: 8948 Alvaro Herrera writes: > I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit > message. However I do see it in the online archives. > Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its > way here? [ checks mail logs... ] Hm, I never got a copy of this either: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the server move. I still haven't seen anything about Michael's ecpg commits of yesterday, either. regards, tom lane