X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A183A2B31; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:35:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90703-03; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web11.manitu.net (web11.manitu.net [217.11.48.111]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE76B3A2B28; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:35:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (dsl-082-082-192-026.arcor-ip.net [82.82.192.26]) (authenticated) by web11.manitu.net (8.10.2-SOL3/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9TGYVw04808; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:34:31 +0200 Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal From: Markus Bertheau To: Dave Page Cc: Mitch Pirtle , PostgreSQL www , PostgreSQL advocacy In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1099067668.2634.2.camel@teetnang> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:34:29 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/318 X-Sequence-Number: 5712 =D0=92 =D0=9F=D1=82=D0=BD, 29.10.2004, =D0=B2 09:52, Dave Page =D0=BF=D0=B8= =D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Which is why we investigated CMSs in depths before we started, and found > that even advanced ones such as Bricolage couldn't meet our requirements > :-(. In view of the fact that the current site does (probably) not only not meet your requirements, but also doesn't meet the perceived needs of the web site's users, wouldn't it be wise to adjust your requirements so that bricolage or plone or whatever fit, in order to get something going? Thanks --=20 Markus Bertheau