X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901513A47E8; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:36:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08678-04; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:36:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (bramble.mmrd.com [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C463A3CB7; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:36:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iACJeiBW012857; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:40:44 -0500 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [10.225.10.110]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iACKaJm23145; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:36:19 -0500 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 4C2FK5KZ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:36:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design From: Robert Treat To: "Gavin M. Roy" Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Dave Page , Omar Kilani , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <41951A3E.4070108@ehpg.net> References: <41950302.3030503@ehpg.net> <1100288278.5493.99.camel@camel> <4195136F.7030702@ehpg.net> <20041112160859.G3792@ganymede.hub.org> <41951A3E.4070108@ehpg.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Nov 2004 15:36:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1100291778.5509.119.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/163 X-Sequence-Number: 5894 Actually all of this call for a vote seems a little premature IMHO. We have problems with both designs that need to be addressed. Let's see what shakes out from that discussion before we put it up for a vote, after all we just might form a consensus anyway. Robert Treat On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 15:17, Gavin M. Roy wrote: > I'm not talking about opening it to input and design suggestions, i'm > talking about a vote: > > A if you like the design at url1 > B if you like the design at url2 > > Not open ended, not allowing for people to say "yeah but do this or do that" > > Gavin > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote: > > > >> > >>> Sorry, but the site has goals of things it needs to accomplish and that > >>> goes beyond "looking cool". I've worked in usability and information > >>> architecture and know the things that need to be accomplished with an > >>> organizations main website and if you leave it up to the general public > >>> your looking for trouble. > >>> Robert Treat > >>> > >> Appearance and usability are both important factors. Are you saying > >> that people outside of -www are not capable of judging both? > > > > > > The wider the audience, the harder it becomes to come to a consensus > > ... those that are interested in the web site developments have/should > > join the -www list, just like you did, and put in their 2 cents ... > > > > ---- > > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > > (http://www.hub.org) > > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > > 7615664 > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if > > your > > joining column's datatypes do not match > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL