X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B4A3A5838; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:10:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21923-08; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:10:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (bramble.mmrd.com [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7A43A5800; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:10:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB2GJOBW015040; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:19:24 -0500 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [10.225.10.110]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB2HACm10515; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:10:14 -0500 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id XBG24QQZ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:10:09 -0500 Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview" From: Robert Treat To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <41AF4963.6080102@commandprompt.com> References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <200412012237.58998.josh@agliodbs.com> <20041202121558.X46440@ganymede.hub.org> <41AF4963.6080102@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 02 Dec 2004 12:10:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/17 X-Sequence-Number: 6136 On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >>> members{a} > >> > >> > >> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion? > >> > >>> corporate{a} > >> > >> > >> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My > >> thoughts: > >> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer; > >> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3 > >> versions. > > > > > > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should > > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a > > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ... > > > I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about > companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists? > Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net > provider? > This is why we never came up with a guideline... Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL