X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857EE3A5922; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:25:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92515-01; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:25:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (bramble.mmrd.com [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57873A58F3; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:25:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB2JY9BW016552; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:34:09 -0500 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [10.225.10.110]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB2KOvm18028; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:24:58 -0500 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id XBG24SMW; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:24:57 -0500 Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview" From: Robert Treat To: Josh Berkus Cc: elein , "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200412021107.23182.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <200412020918.22719.josh@agliodbs.com> <20041202105209.R13004@cookie.varlena.com> <200412021107.23182.josh@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 02 Dec 2004 15:24:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1102019097.2440.94.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/31 X-Sequence-Number: 6150 On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 14:07, Josh Berkus wrote: > Elein, Oleg, > > > And where does something like General Bits fit in as > > a link? Does that contribution (along with advocacy stuff) > > rate a corporate sponsor link? Is auxilliary information > > equivalent to code contributions? What about advocacy work? > > I obviously would like to see Varlena, LLC on the corporate > > sponsor list, at least for the time I spend writing and > > publishing. > > I'd list it. Documentation contributions are still contributions. The link > to General Bits itself would go on the Documentation page, of course. > Hmm... I wouldn't, otherwise we'll have to list every company that we put a link on the website for. The fact that it lives at the Varlena website means we'll be sending traffic that way already. To me the corporate sponsor page is for the "people behind the scenes" that make postgresql happen. Like hub and command prompt who offer hosting/dns services, or 2nd Quadrant that donated Simon to work on PITR, things you wouldn't know unless we told you. With Varlena, they provide an ancillary service, much like EMS Hitech or Nusphere or Dotgeek, that may be of interest to people in the postgresql community, but they aren't providing community resources. Sure we want to let people know about these things, but we shouldn't feel beholden to them. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL