Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
Cc: Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <41AF686C.6060309@cs.msu.su>
References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<200412012237.58998.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200412021025.46143.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<200412020939.37177.josh@agliodbs.com> <41AF58EC.8070100@tinysofa.org>
	<41AF686C.6060309@cs.msu.su>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 02 Dec 2004 15:30:34 -0500
Message-Id: <1102019434.2560.100.camel@camel>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 14:09, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Omar Kilani wrote:
> >> Sure.  However, I'm more concerned about the public & press being able 
> >> to find things than long-term community members, who can always ask on 
> >> IRC.  "About" is instantly understandable to web users;  "Advocacy" is 
> >> not.
> >>
> >> So, an example of "About", a la Omar:
> >> http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/about/casestudies
> >>
> >> I think this works.
> 
> Seems like http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/ is down.

odd, working ok from this side of the globe. 

> 
> > Additionally, we've already restructured and pretty much finished the 
> > whole site. And see no reason why it can't be in for the 15th of December.
> 
> I see one obvious reason: hosting. http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/ still has 2-3 
> second page generation times.
>

We'll need to address this, but I think it is doable.  We should still
be serving up mostly static content anyways, right?
 
> And of course there also was a discussion on "which design is better" which did 
> not lead to any decision.

One of the things on my list of things to be squared away, but otoh all
of the designs we have seen so far are "better", so that shouldn't keep
us from release. 

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL