X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC4A3A5052 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87311-02 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (bramble.mmrd.com [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C113A3EA3 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB3IJ4BW021708; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:19:04 -0500 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [10.225.10.110]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB3J9dm27314; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:09:39 -0500 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id XBG247KB; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:09:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Corporate Contributors WAS: merging advocacy and From: Robert Treat To: Josh Berkus Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200412031018.16024.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1102085621.2440.296.camel@camel> <41B08C6D.10402@commandprompt.com> <200412031018.16024.josh@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 03 Dec 2004 14:09:39 -0500 Message-Id: <1102100979.2441.324.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/58 X-Sequence-Number: 6177 On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:18, Josh Berkus wrote: > Robert, Josh, Elein, etc.: > > I do think this is important to settle. Right now, it's General Bits which > sits square on the border between "contribution" and "external"; Next time it > might be someone else. Sucks for Elein that it's your site we're talking > about, but it helps us make some rules that we'll need again later. > > However, I think that we should take this over to -Advocacy. Even though > this will mean a more chaotic discussion, it IS what the Advocacy list is > for, and if we make decisions here without raising them there, we might as > well kill that list. > > So I'll be laying things out for that list. Agreed. And none of it should effect website completion so it's best to take it off this list. > > > An example is Practical PostgreSQL. That book has been > > online since the day it hit shelves, free for anyone to use. > > But it isn't the same as say donating patches to ECPG or > > PlPerl which gets directly injected into the community. > > Practical PostgreSQL is a community resource, but it is > > not community sponsored. > > On the other hand, PL/PHP is considered a "contribution" even though it is > hosted at CMD's site. > I've spoken with Joshua before about this and I don't really see it as a community contribution myself. I think the only reasons others do is because of the other things that command prompt donates that are contributions (plperl/servers/etc..) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL