X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BF9D93C1 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:48:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82062-01 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:48:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from svr2.postgresql.org (svr2.postgresql.org [65.19.161.25]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EA9D9054 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:48:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by svr2.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D7F0B90 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:41:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E2B2395A8; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com ([205.207.28.82]) by localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 36193-01-3; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (d226-86-55.home.cgocable.net [24.226.86.55]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BD723946F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:37 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating From: Neil Conway To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Tom Lane , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E826@algol.sollentuna.se> References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E826@algol.sollentuna.se> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:46:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1131313608.6884.86.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/50 X-Sequence-Number: 8765 On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 22:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > That's intentional, it's scheduled to go up along with the press release > and related info once the release is done. What is the reasoning for this? IMHO for future releases it would be a better idea to make the beta documentation a part of the main website's list of documentation at about the same time the first beta is released. That would make the documentation easier to find and would also encourage more people to use the beta. -Neil