X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D88FD87A0; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:00:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37655-03; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:00:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5466AD860D; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:00:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (unknown [84.12.200.148]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878AF25336B; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:00:23 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Help speeding up delete From: Simon Riggs To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Tom Lane Cc: Steve Wampler , Postgres-performance In-Reply-To: <4162.1132011763@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <43790A99.9050603@noao.edu> <4162.1132011763@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:00:06 +0000 Message-Id: <1132171206.4959.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/105 X-Sequence-Number: 8820 On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Wampler writes: > > We've got an older system in production (PG 7.2.4). > > Update to 7.4 or later ;-) > > Quite seriously, if you're still using 7.2.4 for production purposes > you could justifiably be accused of negligence. There are three or four > data-loss-grade bugs fixed in the later 7.2.x releases, not to mention > security holes; and that was before we abandoned support for 7.2. > You *really* need to be thinking about an update. Perhaps we should put a link on the home page underneath LATEST RELEASEs saying 7.2: de-supported with a link to a scary note along the lines of the above. ISTM that there are still too many people on older releases. We probably need an explanation of why we support so many releases (in comparison to licenced software) and a note that this does not imply the latest releases are not yet production (in comparison to MySQL or Sybase who have been in beta for a very long time). Best Regards, Simon Riggs