X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0449F9C18 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:37:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29258-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:36:55 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sand2.gxn.net (sand2.gxn.net [195.147.249.208]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE219FA2DB for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:36:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [62.232.55.118] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by sand2.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FgkZr-0003Jv-5a; Thu, 18 May 2006 16:38:15 +0100 Subject: Re: Sun Server Location From: Simon Riggs To: Josh Berkus Cc: Tom Lane , PostgreSQL www In-Reply-To: <1147943739.2646.392.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200605151542.40156.josh@agliodbs.com> <200605171419.09369.josh@agliodbs.com> <7183.1147919908@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200605171942.57234.josh@agliodbs.com> <1147943739.2646.392.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:36:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1147966600.2646.549.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/120 X-Sequence-Number: 10083 On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 10:15 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 19:42 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > > Is there any chance of scaring up some real disk storage from another > > > interested company? I understand the point that Sun isn't in a position > > > to contribute major disk hardware, but maybe someone else is? > > > > I discussed it with some of the Sun folks. It's possible down the line, just > > not right now. > > > > Of course, if anyone knows people at HP or IBM or Rackable we could get a JBOD > > from, I wouldn't turn it down. > > It's possible we can utilise disks from other EDB equipment, so we're > able to have multi-path access. We were also looking at some other > options for disks. > > I'll get some opinions and report back. OK, I can confirm EDB have space, power and willingness to manage and I'll put time in to make sure this is managed as a community resource, with equal access. Operator cover should be possible 24x7 to allow global access, but with a proviso of reasonable efforts, rather than the "best efforts" you'd expect on a pay-for support contract. EDB should also be able to put money in to get some reasonable external disks, but I won't put a figure on it here. Josh, I'd appreciate it if you could pass the hat round a little bit? The T2000 would be physically located in secured premises at EDB in New Jersey, with appropriate firewalls etc.. How does all of that sound? -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com