X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16869FA278 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:54:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02783-03 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:54:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sand2.gxn.net (sand2.gxn.net [195.147.249.208]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EE99FA22C for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:54:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [62.232.55.118] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by sand2.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Fh9C5-0007Ec-DZ; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:55:21 +0100 Subject: Re: Sun Server Location From: Simon Riggs To: Josh Berkus Cc: Tom Lane , PostgreSQL www In-Reply-To: <200605180841.48355.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200605151542.40156.josh@agliodbs.com> <1147943739.2646.392.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1147966600.2646.549.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200605180841.48355.josh@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:53:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1148061236.2646.689.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/123 X-Sequence-Number: 10086 On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 08:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > OK, I can confirm EDB have space, power and willingness to manage and > > I'll put time in to make sure this is managed as a community resource, > > with equal access. Operator cover should be possible 24x7 to allow > > global access, but with a proviso of reasonable efforts, rather than the > > "best efforts" you'd expect on a pay-for support contract. > > It may have already shipped. I'll check. > > > EDB should also be able to put money in to get some reasonable external > > disks, but I won't put a figure on it here. Josh, I'd appreciate it if > > you could pass the hat round a little bit? > > Um, if EDB is not supplying a JBOD or similar extra disks, I don't really > understand the point in having them host it? If we're going to take up a > collection, then I think it makes more sense to host it with an NPO, yes? OK -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com