X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CB99FA4A8; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:28:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18753-01; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:27:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from bdc.geeknet.com.au (unknown [210.9.9.216]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D0F9FA10A; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:27:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from barney.geeknet.com.au ([192.168.61.101]) by bdc.geeknet.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:27:48 +1000 Subject: Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS] From: John Hansen To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Tom Lane , Neil Conway , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200606101248.k5ACmI520313@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200606101248.k5ACmI520313@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:27:43 +1000 Message-Id: <1150334863.13443.3.camel@barney.geeknet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2006 01:27:48.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9162590:01C6901A] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1345-3.52.1006-14508.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.090000-8.000000-2 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/36 X-Sequence-Number: 10192 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 08:48 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Neil Conway writes: > > >>> (The fact that archives.p.o can't properly link between threads that > > >>> cross month boundaries is pretty annoying...) > > >> > > >> Indeed, I was just annoyed by that (again) a few minutes ago. Anyone > > >> on -www have an idea how to fix it? > > > > > > I am also having problems that the date sorting often has a few entries > > > at the end of out of order. I think that needs to be fixed too. > > > > please provide a sample of what you are talking about ... :) > > Sure, search for "misnomer" and sorty by date. Look at the last page. > You will see 2005 entries that should have appeared earlier. > Thats due to a bug in the search engine, not the archives themselves. ... John