Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8119FB390;
	Sat,  4 Aug 2007 15:18:07 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 18201-03-4; Sat,  4 Aug 2007 15:18:04 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from mailbox.samurai.com (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E919FB2AB;
	Sat,  4 Aug 2007 15:18:04 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82])
	by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAA8627CA;
	Sat,  4 Aug 2007 14:18:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com
Received: from mailbox.samurai.com ([205.207.28.82])
	by localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with LMTP id Mrkv5nK5EwTu; Sat,  4 Aug 2007 14:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (adsl-75-61-105-64.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net
	[75.61.105.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D903627C7;
	Sat,  4 Aug 2007 14:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Cc: Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org,
	Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <200708041850300000@04969416>
References: <200708041850300000@04969416>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:17:59 -0700
Message-Id: <1186251479.7232.6.camel@goldbach>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.002,
	BAYES_50=0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200708/58
X-Sequence-Number: 12299

On Sat, 2007-04-08 at 18:50 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> There are disability discrimination issues with all the captcha type
> systems we've looked at in the past, but we're open to suggestions.

What "discrimination issues" are you referring to?

Given the multitude of captcha-like systems, I doubt our requirements
are so unique that we can't find something that does what we need.

-Neil