Subject: Re: favicons
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803121229u8b54a1eye6303e0da839d8db@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200803122016.47576.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<937d27e10803121229u8b54a1eye6303e0da839d8db@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:49 +0100
Message-Id: <1205355709.5803.3.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0


On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:29 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on *.postgresql.org
> > subsites:
> >
> > www et al.              blue elephant
> > wiki                    none
> > developer               black elephant
> > archives                blue elephant
> > buildfarm               black elephant
> > git                     black elephant
> > www.postgresqlfr.org    WTH???
> >
> > Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should we all move to
> > the blue one?
> 
> Black for developer sites, blue for user? I don't think there's any
> plan behind it though, just coincidence. I'm happy to use the blue one
> everywhere.

I'm fairly certain it's "old sites" -> "ugly black elephant" and "new
sites" -> "pretty blue elephant".

Then git and buildfarm probably just copied it off
developer.postgresql.org without checking what was available :-)

personally, I like the blue one much better, and would suggest we switch
all postgresql.org sites to it :-)

//Magnus