Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7362E0081 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:57:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89520-09 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:57:24 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1A02E0083 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:57:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1654DDCCA07; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:57:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3567B100207; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:39:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New email list for emergency communications From: Magnus Hagander To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20080324120112.12a57ef7@jd-laptop> References: <20080324173332.GD23447@crankycanuck.ca> <200803241739.m2OHd7D06888@momjian.us> <20080324174405.GE23447@crankycanuck.ca> <20080324175418.GF5484@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080324193116.6eb3a19c@iridium.wars-nicht.de> <20080324120112.12a57ef7@jd-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:39:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1206527973.6976.9.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/595 X-Sequence-Number: 14714 On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 12:01 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:31:16 +0100 > "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" wrote: > > > Yes, i was asked more than once by ppl using a Google talk account. > > Would be nice to have them added without adding another account in > > pidgin. > > > > Apparently I have more work to do than anyone else :P. I have zero > desire to have people contacting me from gmail, yahoo or other such > thing. I am busy enough. > > The purpose of the jabber server was to allow contributors direct > access to each other. If we open it up, that has the potential for even > more communication overload. > > If we really want a public jabber server we can do that but I would > like it to be separate from the internal jabber.postgresql server. We > could then setup the public jabber server so that it can communicate > with the private jabber server. If people want the public chat, why don't they just use gtalk or whatever public service they prefer? I don't see a reason for us to run one private and one public server. In fact, I don't see a reason for us to run a public one at all - if we were running that, we could just as well run nothing. AFAIK every reasonable IM client people would use today can easily add two jabber accounts (or more), so I don't see the problem, really. //Magnus