Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8AC2E0046 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 13:34:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91939-09 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 13:34:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27042E0033 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 13:34:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4SGZP5B011233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 May 2008 09:35:26 -0700 Subject: Re: replace training blurb with upcoming pug meetings? From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200805281218.20373.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> References: <200805281218.20373.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:36:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1211992592.5508.20.camel@jd-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Wed, 28 May 2008 09:35:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/117 X-Sequence-Number: 15174 On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 12:18 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > In an effort to give more visibility to the pugs, one idea that was floated > around was replacing the training blurb on the main site with an "upcoming > pugs" section, modeled after the upcoming events. The training blurb would > then be changed to a direct link saying "looking for training?" (or similar) > which would take you to the full training page. There are some logistical > issues that would need to be worked out to make this happen, but before we go > down that path, I wanted to get a general consensus on the idea. thoughts? I would be amenable to that. I would like to see .Org focusing a bit more on its "community". Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake