Subject: Re: Git access?
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <20080610220032.GF15591@fetter.org>
References: <20080605155258.GF21648@fetter.org>
	<200806061354.43916.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20080610191013.GC15591@fetter.org>
	<484ED29B.5070706@hagander.net>  <20080610220032.GF15591@fetter.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:05:11 -0700
Message-Id: <1213135511.17340.172.camel@jd-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 15:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:14:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> > > It's an interesting plan, but it's one that's preventing people
> > > from using the service.  How about shelving that plan for the
> > > moment and handing out access as needed to developers? :)
> > 
> > Please don't. Handing more access out in an uncontrolled way will
> > give us a lot more work cleaning things up later.
> 
> With respect, I must disagree.  This resource is incredibly easy to
> maintain--and practically useless--because nobody can get on there.

I think the point is, we don't want to give shell accounts out. Which is
why we are waiting. That is something I can get behind. We don't need to
be handing out yet more shell accounts.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake