Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A753E650E9E for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:10:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11029-10 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:09:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C195650E8F for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:10:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m63JC1PH007827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:12:01 -0700 Subject: Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, rod@iol.ie In-Reply-To: <200807031507.12705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> References: <200807021849.03869.peter_e@gmx.net> <200807031302.16464.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1215106061.6936.26.camel@jd-laptop> <200807031507.12705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:10:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1215112207.6936.47.camel@jd-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:12:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/22 X-Sequence-Number: 15452 On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:07 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2008 13:27:41 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:02 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > AFAICT, you are currently arguing specifically over whether pgsql-php should > be included along with the other lists in Peters proposal. If what you're > really objecting to is Peter's overall proposal that dumping people > from -ports, -cygwin, and -interfaces back onto -general is a problem, please > restate your argument in that wider scope. Fair enough. I do not believe it is wise to dump a bunch of people on general regardless of the low traffic of other lists. General is entirely too active. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake >