Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EB865048C for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:50:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95590-03 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:50:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD6D65048B for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:50:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m681qMUx021664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:52:23 -0700 Subject: Re: Certification? From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Chander Ganesan Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <4872B7AC.6080407@otg-nc.com> References: <4872B7AC.6080407@otg-nc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:51:03 -0700 Message-Id: <1215481863.19052.65.camel@jd-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:52:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/43 X-Sequence-Number: 15473 On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 20:41 -0400, Chander Ganesan wrote: > Hello All, > > I've noticed that, as a trend, more and more training events are listed > that purport a "certification" in PostgreSQL . In many ways, I find > this to be a bit misleading, in that no "industry recognized" > certification for PostgreSQL exists (except perhaps the SRA one in > Japan), and its quite possible that folks might mis-construe the use of > the word "certification" on the "postgresql.org" site as being a > "recognized" certification - or one that is sanctioned by the PostgreSQL > community. > > Perhaps it would be best left to companies to advertise their own > special "certification" on their web site (which they may easily link to > via their training course listing), as opposed to on the PostgreSQL.org > site, where it might be mis-interpreted to mean something that it isn't... > > thoughts? Well if a training company wants to offer a certification for their training...? Don't get me wrong, I know your trying to address quality of content issues here (as well as possible nefarious issues) but I think the market will bring to bear those who are successful and those that aren't. There is a reason .Org has the big old disclaimer that says this is not an endorsement. > > Chander >