Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBE211ADB8A for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:32:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SGg3l-0007ph-S6 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 00:32:51 +0000 Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70B7410; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org ([200.126.81.219] helo=perhan.alvh.no-ip.org) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 7 Apr 2012 17:32:36 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D92BC6E471; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:32:25 -0300 (CLST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane , w^3 Subject: Re: Stopping link spam on the lists From: Alvaro Herrera To: Magnus Hagander In-reply-to: References: <16170.1333746317@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:32:25 -0300 Message-Id: <1333845038-sup-6474@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/git X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-TLS: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-45159-07185 X-Assp-Envelope-From: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org X-Assp-Intended-For: magnus@hagander.net X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Stopping link spam on the lists Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/11 X-Sequence-Number: 20585 Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of s=C3=A1b abr 07 13:59:57 -0300= 2012: > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 18:55, Greg Sabino Mullane w= rote: > > Of course, as usual, all of this talk is pretty pointless as the > > main person who should be involved here, Marc, is not subscribed > > to -www, last I heard. :( >=20 > He's not, but our incoming email no longer passes through the hub.org > antispam, and Alvaro has a decent clue on how the remaining pieces are > stitched together. (Work in progress to clean it up further, of > course, just currently on hold as alvaro has been busy with the CF > work) The remaining question, in my mind, is: is there a way to reliably detect that link spam is just link spam and reject it altogether in Spamassassin? If that's the case, then we could do it at that level and save the work downstream. This is something that Stefan would have to answer. --=20 =C3=81lvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support