Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE4692B8EB for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:52:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmtyL-0004MY-CN for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:52:26 +0000 Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21218EE; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org ([190.95.9.148] helo=perhan.alvh.no-ip.org) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 5 Jul 2012 14:52:09 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B637A6E5EE; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:52:07 -0400 (CLT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Tom Lane , w^3 , Josh Berkus Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues From: Alvaro Herrera To: Magnus Hagander In-reply-to: References: <28687.1341523141@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29222.1341524488@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:52:07 -0400 Message-Id: <1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/git X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-TLS: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-25130-10829 X-Assp-Envelope-From: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org X-Assp-Intended-For: josh@agliodbs.com X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 9.2beta web issues Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201207/21 X-Sequence-Number: 20770 Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue jul 05 17:44:10 -0400 2012= : > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander writes: > >> IIRC we don't normally add this, because we don't want to "assign > >> bugs" to things in beta. Also IIRC, didn't Berkus set up a whole > >> separate list that people are supposed to report beta bugs on? > > > > Geez, I sure hope not, because if there is one I am not subscribed to= it > > (AFAIK), and I bet few other hackers are either. In any case, it's t= he > > height of folly to imagine that people won't try to use the bug repor= t > > form for beta bugs. >=20 > In that case, I definitely suggest we retire it. It's listed on both > http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/ and in the archives, and is > labeled as the one where to post such reports... I think the idea was > that Josh was going to somehow "filter" the reports before putting > them on -bugs, making sure they were proper, etc. And that the list > would also take *positive* test results, which we definitely don't > want listed as bugs. But I'm definitely +1 for getting rid of the > distinction. That list's traffic seems a bit on the low side -- surely we've had people testing more recently than September 2011. --=20 =C3=81lvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support