Message-ID: <1366052525.19761.10.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org>
Subject: Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@gunduz.org>
To: damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:02:05 +0300
In-Reply-To: <516C4833.2050805@dalibo.info>
References: <516C4833.2050805@dalibo.info>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-38oJRRwrAa0rq0CG3dl5"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org


--=-38oJRRwrAa0rq0CG3dl5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi,

On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 20:34 +0200, damien clochard wrote:

> Last week, I submitted an article on pg.org (id #1459) about the release
> of ora2pg11. The content is pretty much the same as the mail I sent to
> -announce on the same day :
>=20
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/516533D0.2090906@dalibo.info
>=20
> I see the article is not approved. Did I miss something ? Is there any
> reason for this ?

Approved. Probably the moderators (including me) missed it.

Regards,
--=20
Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

--=-38oJRRwrAa0rq0CG3dl5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlFsTq0ACgkQtl86P3SPfQ7gLQCg0TBcbQ7vd8jnU9b1vwbK2m8b
qLkAoLnh7y4F4EkfHWJdkMKGUHWxXUqI
=pSwC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-38oJRRwrAa0rq0CG3dl5--