Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D412633808 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:19:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79361-07 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:18:47 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8021A640240 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:18:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2P1IiM4014091; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:18:45 -0400 (EDT) To: Josh Berkus cc: Greg Stark , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters In-reply-to: <49C982D3.1060300@agliodbs.com> References: <665164.63021.qm@web28512.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4136ffa0903241111r4d552600h876839b9e3b65e3c@mail.gmail.com> <49C982D3.1060300@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:03:15 -0700" Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:18:44 -0400 Message-ID: <14090.1237943924@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.01 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.010 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/965 X-Sequence-Number: 135643 Josh Berkus writes: > I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others > definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already > handling a *lot* of traffic for. It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces without much loss IMHO. The other global lists seem to be in good health from what I can see. Can't speak to the regional or user-group lists, I don't follow them. regards, tom lane