To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
cc: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists 
In-reply-to: <20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net> 
References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org>
	<20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
	message dated "Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:27:02 +0200"
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:26:22 -0400
Message-ID: <14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Which lists are slow?

> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
> was referring to, also -hackers.

At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but
I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall.  I regularly notice
batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together,
perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention
to which lists they were on.  I file all the PG lists I read (which is
most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but
I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly
likely to get submissions from non-subscribers.

			regards, tom lane