X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62464D1BB2A for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:29:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28485-03 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:29:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47703D1B57C for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:29:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1QMTcg3014899; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:29:38 -0500 (EST) To: Robert Treat Cc: Andrew Dunstan , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal In-reply-to: <1077829449.2784.18.camel@camel> References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com> <200402262116.38479.peter_e@gmx.net> <200402261228.44788.josh@agliodbs.com> <403E59F6.7000600@dunslane.net> <1077829449.2784.18.camel@camel> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Treat message dated "26 Feb 2004 16:04:09 -0500" Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:29:38 -0500 Message-ID: <14898.1077834578@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/200 X-Sequence-Number: 3765 Robert Treat writes: > On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front, >> but it's not a done deal yet. > I can't imagine the BZ plugin for Gforge would require you to use a > second database system would it? Besides which we can always use red > hats bugzilla port if need be. Yeah, I looked into that when core started discussing this whole thing awhile back. The Red Hat port of BZ to Postgres is perfectly usable. Dave Lawrence (maintainer of said port) told me he hopes to see those changes folded back upstream in another major release or so, at which point RH will stop needing to maintain a fork. But in the meantime we can use their version. It'd sure beat using You Know Who to keep track of our own bugs ;-) I would favor using Bugzilla over anything else just because I'm used to it (have to use it internally at Red Hat anyway). regards, tom lane