Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFyK-006oNq-IL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:14:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFyK-007hL6-1S for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:14:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFyJ-007hKw-OJ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:14:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFyH-000O16-1H for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:14:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 507KEatC1506013; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:14:36 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Nathan Bossart cc: Melanie Plageman , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section In-reply-to: References: <1373018.1736213217@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart message dated "Tue, 07 Jan 2025 11:32:58 -0600" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1506011.1736280876.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:14:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1506012.1736280876@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Nathan Bossart writes: > I haven't reviewed the patch in depth, but I think it's worth considering > whether this change will break any links that work in one version but break > if you change the version number. I believe appendix-obsolete.sgml is > designed to help with that a bit, but I've had mixed results when I've > tried to use it. Of course, it's also possible that we don't care too > much... Yeah, this change: - + will change the doc page's URL and thus break any external links or bookmarks for the whole page or anything on it. That's not the end of the world, but it's slightly annoying. appendix-obsolete.sgml seems to be designed for slightly more heavyweight changes, where it's worth having an intermediate page that explains what changed. Here I think we'd just like a redirect. I might be wrong, but I had the idea that our docs website has a capability to provide such redirects. You'd probably need to ask about that on the pgsql-www list, unless somebody who knows the answer notices this thread. regards, tom lane