X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0D9DCC60 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:07:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56742-07 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:07:57 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22EE9DC945 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:07:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2P67tHV015171; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:07:55 -0500 (EST) To: "Joshua D. Drake" cc: PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: search.postgresql.org In-reply-to: <4424DBC3.3020704@commandprompt.com> References: <4424DBC3.3020704@commandprompt.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Joshua D. Drake" message dated "Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:57:23 -0800" Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:07:55 -0500 Message-ID: <15170.1143266875@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.114 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114] X-Spam-Score: 0.114 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/135 X-Sequence-Number: 9725 "Joshua D. Drake" writes: > I was looking at our search configuration and I noted that out of a > weight of 100 we are only weighing archives at 50 and varlena at 25. > That seems a little low as archives is the primary source of pratical > and real world issues and varlena is a great resource. Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all? regards, tom lane