X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E044214B2800 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:55:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66686-05 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:55:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1303814B27FF for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:55:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7BIt99K015582 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:55:10 -0400 (EDT) To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Wrong version number on bug form (again) (still) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:55:09 -0400 Message-ID: <15581.1092250509@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/82 X-Sequence-Number: 4857 The pop-up list at http://www.postgresql.org/bugform.html offers "7.5 Dev", which probably ought to be replaced by "8.0". Actually I wonder that we shouldn't get rid of the popup and just make the version a text entry field. Seems like the list is *always* out of date. (It's still missing 7.4.1 and later, for example.) We've seen people complain about that before. regards, tom lane