X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28953D1E0F4 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:25:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23082-09 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:25:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E26D1D98A for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:25:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1R5PVTE016842; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:25:32 -0500 (EST) To: Neil Conway Cc: Peter Eisentraut , josh@agliodbs.com, Robert Treat , Andrew Dunstan , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal In-reply-to: <8765dtjmu7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com> <15111.1077835640@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200402261452.49385.josh@agliodbs.com> <200402270020.37548.peter_e@gmx.net> <8765dtjmu7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> Comments: In-reply-to Neil Conway message dated "Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:08:32 -0500" Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:25:31 -0500 Message-ID: <16841.1077859531@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/212 X-Sequence-Number: 3777 Neil Conway writes: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user >> off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up >> using. > Uh, why not? (And more to the point, why raise the barrier to entry on > reporting bugs?) Our first try at a bug tracking system, several years ago, was open to anybody to create entries, and we found that the signal-to-noise ratio went to zero in no time. Too many not-a-bugs, too many support requests, too few actual bugs. We went back to using the pgsql-bugs mailing list. It could be that in the intervening time, people have gotten used to bug trackers because of their availability on other projects. If so, we might find a better grade of reports coming in. I'm not very optimistic about that though. As for raising the barrier, you can presently submit bug reports to pgsql-bugs by either mail or webform. Most of the bug trackers I'm aware of are webform-only. I don't consider that a step forward, especially since a webform isn't very conducive to making good reports (it's hard to attach test cases, for instance). regards, tom lane