X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51879DC87C; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:11:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15785-05; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:11:11 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F809DC85A; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:11:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0GJB5DR017123; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:11:05 -0500 (EST) To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list In-reply-to: <20060116150320.U28752@ganymede.hub.org> References: <9811.1137433999@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060116150320.U28752@ganymede.hub.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Marc G. Fournier" message dated "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:03:48 -0400" Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:11:05 -0500 Message-ID: <17122.1137438665@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.089 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089] X-Spam-Score: 0.089 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/126 X-Sequence-Number: 9314 "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > As someone else suggested, do we want to set Reply-To on that list as > well, to redirect discussions to -hackers? I don't think we should try to force that to happen. A fair part of the followup threads in -committers aren't really very interesting and need not go to -hackers. Another problem with adding Reply-To is that by default a copy will *not* go personally to the particular committer, which is something that you usually do want to happen when commenting on a commit. (BTW, have we yet got things fixed so that all the addresses that appear as "From:" for committers actually work to forward mail to the respective person? Last I checked it seemed not to work for me or Bruce, but that was awhile ago.) regards, tom lane