X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10848D1BA22 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:19:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42262-06 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:19:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3C8D1E17E for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:19:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1R6J8YI017174; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:19:08 -0500 (EST) To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: Neil Conway , Peter Eisentraut , Robert Treat , Andrew Dunstan , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal In-reply-to: <200402262210.21836.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com> <8765dtjmu7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> <16841.1077859531@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200402262210.21836.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:10:21 -0800" Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:19:07 -0500 Message-ID: <17173.1077862747@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/214 X-Sequence-Number: 3779 Josh Berkus writes: > I actually sort of agree with Tom, although I don't want to raise the barrier > too high. I'd suggest allowing all registered users to submit bugs. Possibly workable, but what's your definition of "registered user"? I'd hope that anyone subscribed to any of the mailing lists would be considered registered, for instance. Not sure if we can do that with either BZ or GForge; anyone know? regards, tom lane