Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEA3632B28 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:40:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19941-06 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:40:20 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F6F632232 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:40:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2I3eEOF001978; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:40:14 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Alvaro Herrera , David Blewett , "pgsql-www@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: List Message Footer In-reply-to: <200903180210.n2I2AQP09168@momjian.us> References: <200903180210.n2I2AQP09168@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:10:26 -0400" Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:40:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1977.1237347614@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.012 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/127 X-Sequence-Number: 16781 Bruce Momjian writes: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> But, the question is: why? and not just to you, but Tom/Magnus/Alvarre >> ... I'm not advocating for, I'm just curious why ppl are against ... > Yea, I should have stated that. I think the footer is full enough and I > just don't see enough demand for URL lookups to warrant it. Same here. The information is already provided; we don't need to duplicate it in the footer. I'm not impressed by the argument that some folks' mail programs won't dig it out of the headers --- I think it's about as likely that they won't dig a URL out of a standard footer either. regards, tom lane