Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B389FA354 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45415-01 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE709FA25B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EFC118B427 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55251-07; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C7118B40A; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810E63D322; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:48 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:14:48 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org cc: Greg Sabino Mullane Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce Message-ID: <1F8EBA252898A263D638F137@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200701081202.54350.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200701081202.54350.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/48 X-Sequence-Number: 11315 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, January 08, 2007 12:02:53 -0800 Josh Berkus wrote: > Greg, > >> Yeah, something weird is going on there. From looking at the moderation >> queue, it seems everyone is getting three or four duplicates. Maybe >> we can simply turn that off, Marc? > > ... not if duplicates are actually being received; we don't want 3-4 or > each message. Right now, any duplicates are supposed to be shuffled to the moderators queue to deal with ... what the filter is *supposed* to deal with is spam, which tends to be alot of duplicates of the same message with different headers ... If I remove the duplicate altogether, I suspect that there won't be much change on the lists themselves, but I don't know for sure ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpv0o4QvfyHIvDvMRAh4fAJ46RyMZKD5fi2VfgfDc1uWUhAAMCgCeOV8F PtPbLhUsWcMTQCHYbKeru4o= =nnDt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----