public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Vik Fearing <[email protected]>
To: Benjamin Scherrey <[email protected]>
To: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
Cc: Karl O. Pinc <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:24:45 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACo3ShgjjLo82gJRTLrnS=ChGXz8UPTxmXRp-KJMvvpu_0Wdig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CACo3ShjP=OcV=HsKEQuMFkAL2Z0E20==pUjKbhUd1keH20qQ0w@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CACo3ShgjjLo82gJRTLrnS=ChGXz8UPTxmXRp-KJMvvpu_0Wdig@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/2/24 07:19, Benjamin Scherrey wrote:
> I like the suggested text. I think it's a shame to drop the word
> object, however. Despite it getting a bad name amongst the academics,
> it's still very much in use and often quite useful. If someone's
> searching for an object database I believe Postgres should pop up high
> in the list.
I am curious why you think this. What features of an object database do
you think Postgres has to merit ranking high in search results?
--
Vik Fearing
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox