X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55ABD1B51D for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 01:36:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21582-03 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:35:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148B3D1B515 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:35:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83CBE34305; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:36:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8276733C8B; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:36:08 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:36:08 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Robert Treat Cc: Oleg Bartunov , Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows In-Reply-To: <1064006814.30308.1747.camel@camel> Message-ID: <20030919223514.H6867@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20134.1063985116@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1064006814.30308.1747.camel@camel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/80 X-Sequence-Number: 2548 On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:31, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > Oleg Bartunov writes: > > > > I got message from nusphere.com about windows port of PostgreSQL. > > > > They're looking for full time developer in Russia,Moscow. > > > > > > > Is this is a joke ? > > > > > > No, I expect they're serious. NuSphere does still own the PeerDirect > > > windows port that Jan worked on at his former job. They need someone > > > to maintain that and bring it forward to newer versions of PG. It's > > > not going to be a long-term product (assuming that we ever finish the > > > community's native port), so they need to keep the costs down. I'm > > > not surprised that they'd be looking to send the development overseas > > > instead of keeping it at their US offices. > > > > Hmm, I suspect they have some developers here in Russia. At least full text > > search resembles me MnogoSearch. Anyway, I'm not willing to work with them. > > Postgres forever > > > > Don't be too hasty. I don't know about anyone else, but I'd welcome an > updated commercial native windows solution (When's SRA's port coming out > in 1.0?) , especially if they'd be willing to provide a "diff" of the > code back to the community. We might as well have someone get paid for > work we will probably have to do anyways... I think a few things that Oleg needs to find out first is whether or not PeerDirect *will* feed it back to the community ... how much did they feed back of Jan's work? Considering where win32 seems to be sitting, it doesn't seem like much ...