Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:16:34 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 'Official' Interfaces
In-Reply-To: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20030925121550.W46389@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]
> > Sent: 25 September 2003 14:23
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Justin Clift; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 'Official' Interfaces
> >
> >
> >
> > why not a simple "poll" listing the interfaces, and based on
> > votes (ie. # of ppl using that interface), it rises to the
> > top of the lists?  Let usage denote "best" ... if it isn't,
> > nobody would be using it, would they?
>
> That's not a bad idea. We could do the same for admin interfaces....

The ability to maybe add comments/reviews to each would be good too ...
that way its not what *we* think is the best, but its what those using it
think ...