X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBE0D1B520; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82294-05; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:57:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (momjian.navpoint.com [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA1CD1B4FD; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:57:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h99Hv2E11404; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:57:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200310091757.h99Hv2E11404@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows In-Reply-To: <1064492591.25702.2084.camel@camel> To: Robert Treat Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:57:02 -0400 (EDT) Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Oleg Bartunov , Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL106 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/4 X-Sequence-Number: 2594 Robert Treat wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Don't be too hasty. I don't know about anyone else, but I'd welcome an > > > > updated commercial native windows solution (When's SRA's port coming out > > > > in 1.0?) , especially if they'd be willing to provide a "diff" of the > > > > code back to the community. We might as well have someone get paid for > > > > work we will probably have to do anyways... > > > > > > I think a few things that Oleg needs to find out first is whether or not > > > PeerDirect *will* feed it back to the community ... how much did they feed > > > back of Jan's work? Considering where win32 seems to be sitting, it > > > doesn't seem like much ... > > > > PeerDirect contributed the code, but neither they or Jan wanted to port > > it up to current CVS, and that's were we/I got stuck. > > > > So it would be a boon for them to pay someone to bring it up to date > (assuming they would donate it back to the community). > > > > SRA's Windows port is up to 7.3.4, and I think they just released > > version 1.1, so that is going fine --- and I have the source code to > > use in our native Win32 port, just not the threading stuff. > > And if I've paid attention, the threading bits are what SRA used to get > around the fork/exec issues? > > Incidentally I don't recall any announcements from SRA that they were > past the beta development phase with their version, seems like that > could have gotten some mention on the main postgresql site. Here is SRA's News page, translated into English: http://www.excite.co.jp/world/url/body/?wb_url=http%3A%2F%2Fosb.sra.co.jp&submit=%83E%83F%83u%83y%81%5B%83W%96%7C%96%F3&wb_lp=JAEN&wb_dis=2&wb_co=excitejapan (Babelfish has problems, so I used Excite.) You can see the products they have. I will post something to the PostgreSQL events list. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073